Tool NotesWhat it does, the formula, and what it assumes

What this tool does

A lookup table of 6×19 wire rope: minimum breaking force and safe working load by diameter, for fiber core and IWRC, in Improved Plow Steel (IPS), Extra Improved Plow Steel (EIPS) and Extra Extra Improved Plow Steel (EEIPS) grades.

Shackle capacities sit alongside it, so the rope and the hardware that terminates it can be picked off the same page.

Formula

Safe working load is minimum breaking force divided by the design factor. The tables here use 5:1, the design factor for wire rope slings.

SWL = Minimum Breaking Force / 5design factor 5:1
Select rope:    SWL ≥ required tension
Select shackle: SWL ≥ required tension
Vertical capacity per leg = SWL × sin αα measured from horizontal; an angled leg lifts less than its straight-pull SWL, and the shallower the angle, the less it lifts

Assumptions

The tables list Safe Working Loads (SWL) for wire rope using a 5:1 design factor. Shackles list the manufacturer's stamped Working Load Limit. Values assume a straight vertical pull; no sling-angle reduction, dynamic amplification, or D/d bending loss is built in.

  • Design factor 5:1, SWL = minimum breaking force ÷ 5. The SWL-to-MBF ratio shall be verified by the manufacturer of the rigging elements; their published rating governs.
  • Vertical pull, a single leg loaded straight down; angled or multi-leg lifts raise tension and must be derated.
  • Static, no shock, swing, or impact factor is included.
  • Condition, a published SWL applies to rope in as-new condition.
  • Rope SWL, not sling WLL, termination efficiency is not applied. The fabricator's tagged WLL governs for a finished sling.
Technical NotesDerivation, worked example, applications and checks

How values are derived

Rope SWL is the catalog breaking force divided by the design factor; selection returns the smallest size whose SWL meets the required tension. Shackles are chosen by their rated SWL. Minimum breaking force is a published property of the rope; it is never calculated. The equations are in the Formula block above.

Cross-section of 6x19 wire rope: six 19-wire strands laid around an independent wire rope core
6×19 IWRC in section: six 19-wire strands laid around a core that is itself a small wire rope. Swap that core for fiber and the same diameter is FC, the lighter and weaker half of the table.
Screw pin anchor shackle with 3/4 in and WLL 4 3/4 T stamped on the bow
A 3/4 in shackle is stamped WLL 4-3/4 t (10,472 lb). That figure is read off the bow, not worked out from the rope beside it.
  • Grades & core, breaking strength IPS < EIPS < EEIPS; an IWRC core is stronger than fiber core (FC).
  • Shackles are not derived, a shackle carries the manufacturer's stamped Working Load Limit, and the ultimate column is their published minimum, carried as published. The 5:1 design factor is not applied to it in either direction.

Worked example

3/4 in 6x19 IWRC, EIPS grade

Given

  • Diameter: 3/4 in
  • Construction: 6×19 IWRC
  • Grade: EIPS (Extra Improved Plow Steel)

Solve

Minimum breaking force = 58,800 lbffrom the table
SWL = 58,800 / 5 = 11,760 lbfdesign factor 5:1
2-leg pick at 60°: 11,760 × sin 60° × 2 = 20,369 lbusable vertical
Shackle: 3/4 in WLL 10,472 lb < 11,760 lb → use 7/8 in, WLL 14,330 lbfrom the shackle table

11,760 lb per leg vertical. Two legs at 60° will lift roughly 20,370 lb. Same pair at 30°: 11,760 × sin 30° × 2 = 11,760 lb. Sling angle halves the usable lift.

D/d ratio

D/d = D / d. D = diameter of the surface the rope bends around (pin, hook, sheave). d = nominal rope diameter. Larger D/d, gentler bend. Smaller D/d, more bending stress on the wires and less rope efficiency.

Curve of rope efficiency against D/d ratio, rising steeply below D/d of 8 and flattening above 20
Illustrative only. Shape of the trend, not manufacturer efficiency data.

3/4 in 6×19 eye-and-eye sling, no thimble

Given

  • Sling: 3/4 in 6×19 eye-and-eye, no thimble
  • Connection: the eye goes over a 3/4 in shackle pin, ≈ 0.88 in

Solve

D/d = 0.88 / 0.75 = 1.17
Published sling ratings are commonly based on 25:1

The shackle WLL checks out. The sling does not keep its published capacity at D/d = 1.17. Separate ratings; the connection geometry controls.

  • No generic reduction factor, efficiency at small D/d depends on construction, grade, termination, and contact geometry. Use manufacturer data or a qualified person, not MBF × a guessed factor. The curve above is illustrative only, not design data.
  • Thimbles change the connection, a properly sized thimble gives the eye a larger, controlled bearing surface. Consider a thimble where the eye connects directly to shackles, hooks, or master links, especially on repeat use.
  • Unthimbled eye-and-eye slings, are made for basket and choker hitches, where the sling body wraps the load. In a vertical hitch, keep the bare eye off small pins.
  • Fixes, larger-radius pin, hook or sheave; a thimble; a manufacturer-rated sling/shackle pairing; or a rated synthetic sling where the geometry forces a small radius.

Sling hitches and sling types

Vertical, choker and basket hitches shown side by side with capacity factors of 1.0, 0.8 and 2.0
Vertical, choker and basket, with the factor each applies to the sling's rated vertical capacity.

Sling hitch types & capacity

Factors are relative to the sling's rated vertical capacity.

HitchTypical factorDescription
Vertical1.00×One vertical leg supports the load.
Basket2.00×Two portions of the sling carry the load.
Choker0.75–0.80×Sling passed around the load and choked.

Basket and choker factors are typical values, not universal ratings. Factors assume vertical legs; angled rigging reduces capacity further. Manufacturer's published rating for the specific configuration governs.

Synthetic vs wire rope slings

Synthetic (round and flat/web) slings are light, flexible, easy to handle, and kind to finished surfaces; round slings conform best, web slings position easily. Wire rope is heavier and stiffer but stands up to abrasion, rough handling, and heat, so it carries most heavy construction picks.

SyntheticWire rope
WeightLightHeavy
FlexibilityExcellentModerate
Surface protectionExcellentLower
Abrasion / cut resistanceLowerHigher
Heat resistanceLowerHigher
Best suited forFinished, irregular, lighter loadsHeavy, rough, abrasive work

Synthetics cut, abrade, and heat-damage easily: protect every edge. Wire rope can mark load surfaces and needs inspection for broken wires, kinks, bird-caging, and corrosion.

Applications & rules of thumb

  • Mind the D/d ratio, bending rope over a small pin or sharp edge cuts its strength; keep the bend diameter large. The D/d ratio group above is where the numbers and the fixes are.
  • Derate for dynamics, fast picks, swinging, or unequal legs push real tension above the static value; add margin.
  • Pair with Pick Points, use the Pick Points tool to get the actual leg tension and angle, then size rope and shackle here.

Field notes

  • 5:1 is the typical factor for wire rope slings. It is not universal, as some owners and jurisdictions specify higher. Confirm before you use these numbers.
  • All rigging shall be inspected periodically, before and after use. Any rigging with broken wires, kinks, bird-caging, crushing or corrosion shall be removed from service immediately.
  • Terminations govern. A wire rope clip assembly develops roughly 80% of the rope's strength; a properly poured or swaged socket develops close to 100%.
  • Extra caution with synthetics, more open to cuts, abrasion, UV, heat, and chemicals than wire rope. Pad every edge; inspect before use.

Educational reference only. Verify every result independently and apply the safety factors and load combinations required by the governing code and a qualified engineer.

Quick reference

  • QR01 - Sling Tension

    PDF · 579 KB — Static Pick Analysis - Sling Tension and Angle 2 vs. 4-Sling Comparison, Equations, Worked Examples, Field Notes + More

  • QR02 - Rigging

    PDF · 1.0 MB — Wire Rope SWL - Selection, D/d Ratio, Sling Hitches, MBF Tables Equations, Worked Examples, Diagrams, Field Notes, Wire Rope and Shackle MBF Tables + More

Related tools

Need to source materials? Explore the STL NETWORK.